The presentation and content of the memo should be polished, easy to understand, and free of jargon.Writing professionally does not imply that you can’t be passionate about your topic, but your policy recommendations should be grounded in solid reasoning and a succinct writing style.
The presentation and content of the memo should be polished, easy to understand, and free of jargon.Writing professionally does not imply that you can’t be passionate about your topic, but your policy recommendations should be grounded in solid reasoning and a succinct writing style.Tags: Senior Project Research Paper TopicsStudents Should Not Have HomeworkHow To Double Space An EssayTiananmen Square EssaysBusiness Intelligence Case Study Hospital Bi Helps HealthcareHigh School Homework HelpArgumentative Essay On Social Networking PrivacyBusiness Project Plan Example
A policy memo is a practical and professionally written document that can vary in length from one page to over one hundred pages.
It provides analysis and/or recommendations directed to a predetermined audience regarding a specific situation or topic.
To address this, policy memos should include a clear cost-benefit analysis that considers anticipated outcomes, the potential impact on stakeholder groups you have identified, clear and quantifiable performance goals, and how success is to be measured.
A policy memo requires clear and simple language that avoids unnecessary jargon and concepts of an academic discipline. Use one paragraph to develop one idea or argument and make that idea or argument explicit within the first one or two sentences.
Your memo should have a straightforward, explicit organizational structure that provides well-explained arguments arranged within a logical sequence of reasoning [think in terms of an if/then logic model--if this policy recommendation, then this action; if this benefit, then this potential cost; if this group is allocated resources, then who may be excluded].
The visual impact of your memo affects the reader’s ability to grasp your ideas quickly and easily. The contents of a policy memo can be organized in a variety of ways. Both provide useful approaches to writing a policy memo should your professor not provide you with specific guidance.There is no thesis statement or overall theoretical framework underpinning the document; the focus is on describing one or more specific policy recommendations and their supporting action items.You should not approach writing a policy memo like you would an academic research paper.As much as possible, this criteria should be derived from your cost/benefit analysis. This is usually where other research about the problem or issue of concern is summarized.Do not hide or under-report information that does not support your policy recommendations. Describe how you plan to identify and locate the information on which your policy memo is based.Identify the stakeholders impacted by the proposed solutions and describe in what ways the stakeholders benefit from your proposed solution.Focus on identifying solutions that have not been proposed or tested elsewhere.Just as you should note limitations in an original research study, a policy memo should describe the weaknesses of your analysis. This may include peer-reviewed journals and books as well as possible professionals you interviewed, databases and websites you explored, or legislative histories or relevant case law that you used.Be straightforward about it because doing so strengthens your arguments and it will help the reader to assess the overall impact of recommended policy changes.: Technically, your policy memo could argue for maintaining the status quo. Harvard University; How to Write a Public Policy Memo. Remember this is not intended to be a thorough literature review; only choose sources that persuasively support your position or that helps lay a foundation for understanding why actions need to be taken.A policy memo is not an argumentative debate paper.The reader should expect your recommendations to be based upon evidence that the problem exists and of the consequences [both good and bad] of adopting particular policy alternatives.