Then, examine the text in more depth to analyze it.
When you have finished developing your analysis, draft it according to critical analysis structure.
Ideally, an article will be able to undergo scrutiny and retain its findings as valid.
The specific questions used to assess validity change slightly with different study designs and article types.
Yes, the aim is clearly stated in the essay, “This study aimed to explore the lived experience of sub-fertility among Chinese couples in Hong Kong. The population of the research is the couples that without children even if they tried. Yes, this study uses phenomenological approach which can reflects one’s experience and feelings( Parahoo 1997) as the frame of the design of this research, this can logically making abstract materials into qualitative data for a research.
The research investigates their feelings and experience by interviews in 5 months, from August 2003 to January 2004. Since quantitative research aims of numerical and accountable result (Denzin, Lincoln  ), it is not suitable to use quantitative approach to investigate feelings and experience. Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research?
He believes evidence-based medicine will make everyone a better clinician.
He lives in Denver, Colorado and enjoys all the state has to offer, other than skiing, because he is a rebel and refuses to fall into that Colorado stereotype.
In the following, CASP will be used to criticize 1 quantitative research and 1 qualitative research.
Paper 1 For quantitative research, Experiences of sub-fertility among Chinese couples in Hong Kong: a qualitative study (Loke, A, Yu P, Hayter M (2011) would be used. Was there a clear statement of aims of the research?