Tags: Economic Essay PapersBusiness Plan MistakesIdeas For Argumentative Research Papers1920s Essay ConclusionResearch Papers On E-LearningStem Cell Research Controversy EssayResearch Papers Genetic Engineering Cloning
The fact that she does adds to the offensiveness of deducing that the mother can do nothing from the supposition that third parties can do nothing.But it does more than this: it casts a bright light on the supposition that third parties can do nothing.[If he is unplugged from you now, he will die; but] in nine months he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you.
But, Thomson says, the person threatened can intervene, by which justification a mother can rightfully abort.
For what we have to keep in mind is that the mother and the unborn child are not like two tenants in a small house, which has, by unfortunate mistake, been rented to both: the mother owns the house.
However, this does not mean that the person being crushed cannot act in self-defense and attack the child to save his or her own life.
To liken this to pregnancy, the mother can be thought to be the house, the fetus the growing-child.
In such a case, the mother's life is being threatened, and the fetus is the one who threatens it.
Because for no reason should the mother's life be threatened, and also for no reason is the fetus threatening it, both are innocent, and thus no third party can intervene.
The child on the other hand won't be crushed to death; if nothing is done to stop him from growing he'll be hurt, but in the end he'll simply burst open the house and walk out a free man.
Thomson concedes that a third party indeed cannot make the choice to kill either the person being crushed or the child.
You don't want children, so you fix up your windows with fine mesh screens, the very best you can buy.
As can happen, however, and on very, very rare occasions does happen, one of the screens is defective; and a seed drifts in and takes root.